New Report: Carbon Pricing is Essential for Achieving a Clean, Reliable Energy Grid

Yahoo! News

March 16, 2022

WASHINGTON, DC – An economy-wide carbon price is key to ensuring all Americans have access to affordable and reliable electricity as we transition to a low-carbon economy, according to a new report released Wednesday by the Climate Leadership Council at a virtual event. The report, co-authored by former FERC Chair Neil Chatterjee and Council CEO Greg Bertelsen, outlines why a carbon price and a more reliable energy grid are essential for meeting deep decarbonization goals by midcentury.

“In order to successfully decarbonize the U.S. economy, we will need to increase our reliance on the electric grid. As this transition takes place, the grid is coming under unprecedented strain from more frequent and prolonged extreme weather events,” Bertelsen said. “Thankfully, carbon pricing is naturally aligned with grid reliability. It works within our existing energy system to add capacity where it is needed and to reduce demand where possible, providing the maximum flexibility as we make the much-needed clean energy transition.”

Among its key findings, the report, “Achieving Grid Reliability and Decarbonization through Carbon Pricing,” highlights how a carbon price improves grid reliability:

  • Carbon pricing is technology- and location-neutral. Because carbon pricing does not pick which zero- and low-carbon options contribute to the resource mix, it efficiently moves the power sector toward the right set of resources to deliver emissions reductions and ensure sufficient energy supply and operating reliability to meet customer demand, all at least cost.

  • Carbon pricing sends a steady, predictable price signal. This provides investors, grid operators and power system planners with better data to forecast supply and demand trends and accommodate emerging and new technologies with a variety of attributes to build out the grid of the future.

  • Carbon pricing fosters economy-wide innovation. This allows the U.S. to decarbonize its entire economy rapidly while creating headroom for the power sector to decarbonize in a manner that supports reliability for consumers.

Curt Morgan, CDEO of Vistra Corp., a leading integrated retail electricity and power generation company, says achieving grid reliability is foundational to addressing climate change. “The push for lower carbon emissions will require greater electrification of the economy, which means a dramatic increase in demand for electricity,” Morgan said. “Electricity is the lifeblood of the American economy, so we must accomplish the transition to a carbon-free grid by balancing affordability, emissions, and reliability. Decarbonizing the electric sector and the broader economy with a price on carbon is the most efficient, equitable, and transparent way to incentivize investments in low- to no-carbon resources. In addition, coupling a carbon border adjustment fee with a price on carbon will ensure the competitiveness of U.S. companies and incentivize the international community to participate in decarbonization. This will provide the least disruptive transition to a carbon-free economy while ensuring Americans and American companies have a level playing field.”

https://news.yahoo.com/report-carbon-pricing-essential-achieving-175111645.html

In Virginia, abandoned coal mines are transformed into solar farms

Six old mining sites owned by the Nature Conservancy will be some of the first utility-scale solar farms in the region — and the nonprofit group hopes the model can be replicated nationwide

By Zoeann Murphy, The Washington Post, March 3, 2022

Empty freight cars line the railroad tracks as far as the eye can see from Tim Jennings’s backyard in Dante — a town of less than 600 residents.

“They should open up some more new mines around here,” the 61-year-old former coal miner says, pointing up at the mountains surrounding the valley. “Solar panels — that might work too.”

In southwest Virginia, abandoned coal mines are being transformed into solar installations that will be large enough to contribute renewable energy to the electric grid. Six old mining sites owned by the Nature Conservancy will be some of the first utility-scale solar farms in the region — and the nonprofit group hopes it’s creating a model that can be replicated nationwide.

In 2019, the Nature Conservancy acquired 253,000 acres of forest in the central Appalachian Mountains that it calls the Cumberland Forest Project. It’s one small part of the group’s efforts in the mountain range, which reaches from Alabama to Canada.

“We’ve identified the Appalachians as one of the most important places on Earth for us to do conservation,” says Brad Kreps, the Nature Conservancy’s Clinch Valley program director, who is leading the solar projects. “We put the Appalachians in a very rare company along with the Amazon, the wild lands of Kenya and the forests of Borneo.”

The Cumberland Forest includes several abandoned mine sites scattered around Virginia’s coal fields region. Solar developers partnering with the Nature Conservancy, such as Dominion Energy and Sun Tribe, say the mine sites have vast flat areas exposed to sunlight that are a rarity in the mountains, and the sites offer advantages like being close to transmission lines.

“In the coalfield region, there’s about 100,000 acres that’s been impacted from mining,” points out Daniel Kestner with the Virginia Department of Energy. “Better to build on a lot of these mine sites than some prime farmland or some areas that maybe don’t want solar in their community.” He’s also hopeful the projects will bring tax revenue and jobs to the area.

Nationwide coal mining jobs dropped from more than 175,000 in 1985 to about 40,000 in 2020, according to a recent Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities report. Solar won’t replace what was once reliable long-term work. The jobs will primarily be in construction.

Lou Wallace, Board of Supervisors chairperson for Russell County, Va., is pushing for counties in the coal fields to diversify their economies. She’s been promoting the beauty of the area’s rivers and mountains for recreation and tourism. Her family relied on coal for generations.

“We’re very proud to be an energy-producing community,” she says when asked about the new solar farms being built on abandoned coal mines. “This is helping us to reimagine how we produce the energy. So we’re still able to say we’re keeping the lights on somewhere.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2022/03/03/coal-mines-solar-farms-climate-change-video/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=wp_energy_and_environment&wpisrc=nl_green

Coastal Sea Levels in U.S. to Rise a Foot by 2050, Study Confirms

More precise measurements indicate that the increase will happen “no matter what we do about emissions.”

By Henry Fountain, The New York Times, Feb. 15, 2022

Sea levels along the coastal United States will rise by about a foot or more on average by 2050, government scientists said Tuesday, with the result that rising water now considered “nuisance flooding” will become far more damaging.

A report by researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other agencies also found that, at the current rate of warming, at least two feet of sea-level rise is expected by the end of the century.

“What we’re reporting out is historic,” said Rick Spinrad, the NOAA administrator, at a news conference announcing the findings. “The United States is expected to experience as much sea level rise in the next 30 years as we saw over the span of the last century.”

Dr. Spinrad said that while cutting greenhouse gas emissions to limit warming was critically important, the projected sea level rise by 2050 “will happen no matter what we do about emissions.”

The report is an update of a 2017 study, and is similarly based on data from tide gauges and satellite observations.

But the new study has relatively precise estimates of sea level rise by 2050, a result of improved computer modeling and better understanding of the impact of global warming on the huge Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. That is “providing more confidence in our ability to predict” effects by midcentury, said William Sweet, an oceanographer with NOAA’s National Ocean Service and an author of the report.

About 40 percent of the United States population, or 130 million people, live within 60 miles of the ocean. But sea level rise will not affect all of them equally, because it is not uniform.

In the United States, land subsidence and compaction of sediments along much of the East and Gulf coasts add to the increase; in those areas sea level rise may exceed one foot in the next three decades, the report said.

On the West Coast, sinking land and compaction are less common, so sea level rise is expected to be at the lower end of projections.

The report said that the calculated rise over the next three decades means that floods related to tides and storm surges will be higher and reach farther inland, increasing the damage.

What the report described as moderate or typically damaging flooding will occur 10 times more often by 2050 than it does today. Major destructive coastal floods, although still relatively rare, will become more common as well.

For communities on the East and Gulf coasts, the expected sea level rise “will create a profound increase in the frequency of coastal flooding, even in the absence of storms or heavy rainfall,” said Nicole LeBoeuf, director of the National Ocean Service.

Currently many communities on those coasts experience regular “nuisance” or “sunny day” flooding, when high tides become even higher because of the influence of the moon, wind or other factors.

But what were once nuisance floods are likely to become damaging, Dr. Sweet said.

“We definitely are predicting a flood regime shift,” he said.

The report projects that sea levels will rise an average of 10 to 12 inches by 2050, which is about as much as the increase during the 100 years from 1920 to 2020. Those projections don’t change no matter how much greenhouse gas emissions are cut over that time.

Estimates for sea level rise by 2100 in the report are less certain. But in this case, the worldwide trajectory of emissions will have a significant effect. Allowing emissions to continue unabated could add 1.5 to 5 feet more to sea levels by the end of the century, for a total of up to 7 feet, the report concluded.

The report provides detailed sea level projections for states and territories by decade for the next 100 years. Dr. Spinrad said it was meant to help local officials, planners and engineers make decisions about where to locate or how to protect critical infrastructure like roads, wastewater treatment systems and energy plants, and otherwise adapt to rising waters.

He described the report as a “wake-up call” for the United States. “But it’s a wake-up call that comes with a silver lining,” he said. “It provides us with information needed to act now to best position ourselves for the future.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/15/climate/us-rising-sea-levels.html?searchResultPosition=1

As Storms Intensify, the Job of TV Weather Person Gets More Serious

Once considered comic relief to anchors, television meteorologists are making it clear to viewers that they are covering a crisis in real time.

By Marc Tracy, The New York Times, Jan. 29, 2022

After the remains of Hurricane Ida dumped historic levels of rain in the Northeast last year, ABC News’s chief meteorologist, Ginger Zee, stood in front of a collapsed bridge in New Jersey and gave viewers of “Good Morning America” a clear warning.

“Human-induced” global warming does not cause storms like Hurricane Ida to happen in the first place, Ms. Zee said. But the higher moisture levels over oceans do make them more destructive.

“Extreme events that would have already happened,” she said, “are going to become more extreme.”

The job of TV weather reporter is changing along with the weather.

For decades, the men and women taking their best educated guess about the weather provided a respite from grim news reports, often playing a comic foil to the anchors. Before Willard Scott became the most prominent weatherman of the 1980s on NBC’s “Today Show,” he had played Ronald McDonald and Bozo the Clown.

But Ms. Zee and her colleagues see themselves as tracking maybe the most serious story of our time. Increasingly destructive weather had already given TV meteorologists a more visceral presence in viewers’ lives. In the last few years, though, they have often gone out of their way to remind viewers explicitly that human-created climate change is a real and disruptive force that has put lives and the environment at risk.

“As a scientist and someone who understands the atmosphere, I have not only a passion but a true connection to climate science,” Ms. Zee, who majored in meteorology at Valparaiso University, said in an interview.

On CNN, the meteorologist Derek Van Dam dipped into international politics in October with a report on the link between climate change and migration crises. The Weather Channel announced last summer it would increase its coverage of climate change. Even local broadcasters known for five-day forecasts are no longer avoiding the topic.

“During the weathercast, you generally want to give people what they’re looking for at that moment,” said Jeff Berardelli, who moved to NBC’s Tampa affiliate in November after time as a national meteorologist for CBS News. “But when the opportunity presents itself, I will put it into its climate context.”

In an article on Friday about the weekend’s impending snowstorm in the Northeast, Mr. Berardelli reported that warming waters off the Northeast were probably the cause of far more frequent major winter weather events. The Tampa Bay area is also getting a share of extreme weather, with freezing temperatures expected on Sunday, which Mr. Berardelli said could be related to the storm a thousand miles away.

Al Roker, the weather and feature anchor of NBC’s “Today” show and a longtime co-host, said that NBC News’s climate unit — the weather unit’s new name as of 2019 — does not try to “force the issue or beat you over the head.” Instead, he said, the group draws careful correlations between severe weather events and climate change.

In 2021, the unit offered more than 50 segments that concerned climate change, untethered to weather forecasts — about drought in the West, wet summers, rapidly intensifying hurricanes — compared with roughly 20 in 2019, Mr. Roker said.

This year marks the 25th anniversary of a summit at the White House of more than 100 national and local television forecasters. Then-President Bill Clinton hoped that they would communicate the realities of global warming to the public.

But many of the meteorologists and climate scientists interviewed for this article said the trend of weather personalities broadcasting frankly about man-made global warming was much more recent, as the consequences of climate change have grown starker. The topic has remained politically divisive, with many conservatives — including former President Donald J. Trump — dismissive of the overwhelming scientific consensus.

The meteorologist Amy Freeze (her given name, she noted) said that Fox Weather, the 24-hour streaming channel started in October, has acknowledged the issue. The channel was set to take over Fox Business’s airwaves Saturday morning and afternoon (as well as one early-morning hour on Fox News) in deference to the weekend’s storm. She conceded that the topic is fraught “in the political arena.”

“Our job is to help people live better and to give them information and tools they can use in the here and the now,” Ms. Freeze said. “So we are going to cover climate change.”

James Spann, a meteorologist at ABC’s affiliate in Birmingham, Ala., wrote in a Medium article last year that he mostly eschews explicit mentions of climate to avoid alienating some viewers. “Say anything about climate and you lose half your audience,” he said.

Other forecasters insisted that positive feedback for climate coverage far outweighed negative responses. “I don’t look at my position as a bully pulpit,” Mr. Roker said. “It’s informational. You can open more eyes by just presenting facts.

“Our management and producers don’t underestimate our audience,” he added. “I think politicians may.”

More than 1,000 TV meteorologists receive free weekly bursts of information, data and visuals on links between the weather and climate change from Climate Central, a nonprofit organization that works with journalists to publicize facts about climate change. Forecasters, said Bernadette Woods Placky, Climate Central’s chief meteorologist, “have been at the forefront of making these connections to the public.”

Several meteorologists said they used Climate Central’s pitches and materials on-air. Elizabeth Robaina, the meteorologist for Telemundo’s affiliate in San Juan, P.R., said she has used its Spanish-language graphics.

Emily Gracey Miller, until last year the meteorologist at ABC’s affiliate in Charleston, S.C., praised Climate Central for responsibly conveying climate news in relevant and not didactic ways.

“They would say things like, ‘Here’s how warmer temperatures over the past decade have influenced beer production,’” she said.

Ms. Miller’s former channel is owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group, which in the past has asked its stations to run politically conservative news items. Ms. Miller said she felt able to discuss man-made climate change on-air. A Sinclair representative did not respond to a request for comment.

Ms. Zee, the first female chief meteorologist at a major broadcast network, said she became interested in the weather during her childhood watching storms develop over Lake Michigan. As a teenager, she saw a future version of herself in the storm-chasing meteorologist played by Helen Hunt in the 1996 movie “Twister.”

Now, she hosts a recurring feature on climate change with the title “It’s Not Too Late,” including a 50-minute special around last Earth Day that streamed on Hulu. She recently added the titles of chief climate correspondent and managing editor of a new ABC News unit devoted to climate change. Topics she reports on include those only adjacent to the weather, such as carbon renewal technologies.

“Someone said, ‘Why did you change into such an advocate?’” Ms. Zee said. “Well, I’ve always been in love with the atmosphere, considerate of it, respecting it. But, mostly, this is just science. At the end of the day, I’m just telling you the science.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/29/business/tv-weather-climate-change.html

Global Carbon Price Could be ‘Game Changer,’ BOE Official Says

By Reed Landberg, Bloomberg News, Jan. 13, 2022

Bank of England policy maker said adopting a global price on fossil fuel pollution could spur investment and productivity that would lift the world economy out of its torpor.

Catherine Mann, a member of the U.K. central bank’s Monetary Policy Committee, said that pricing carbon emissions everywhere could feed a fundamental improvement in productivity that would give a positive jolt to growth.

“Changing the rate of the relative price of carbon is a game changer for creating incentives,” Mann said at a web event hosted by the European Investment Bank on Thursday.

Her remarks suggest a way for policy makers to boost the potential growth rate, which has lagged in the past decade. While computer technology lifted productivity in the 1990s, those gains have been slower in recent years, with economists debating ways to deliver a new gains.

Mann has become an increasingly vocal advocate for global carbon pricing as a way to deliver on reducing emissions and stimulating growth. Last week, she called it a “holy grail” that could lead to “higher level of economic performance in the medium term” in addition to benefits for the climate.

“If you change the relative price of carbon, you have to change products, processes, workplace practices,” Mann said at the American Economic Association on Jan. 7. “You have got to invest in something different in order to change those three, and you’ve got to change consumer behavior as well.”

Such a shift would have to be global to have traction, Mann said, and that goal may prove elusive.

Envoys from almost 200 nations have debated a global framework for carbon markets for decades at the United Nations climate talks. They agreed on a rulebook for offsets last year, though previous attempts to create a global market have sputtered.

Carbon pricing emerged as a tool for controlling emissions in 1997, when the concept was endorsed at UN talks as part of the Kyoto Protocol. 

Since then, carbon-pricing initiatives have sprung up in 65 jurisdictions, according to the World Bank. But the patchwork of systems each work differently and target pollution from different sources.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-13/global-carbon-price-could-be-game-changer-boe-official-says?cmpid=BBD011422_GREENDAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=220114&utm_campaign=greendaily&sref=b07pzY0b

Opinion: America needs leaders who can unite the nation on climate change

By Bill Rappleye, Deseret News (Salt Lake City), Jan. 11, 2022

Here’s what we learned in 2021 about addressing climate change: a partisan approach will never work.

Democrats tried and failed to push through their climate agenda without broad support. Even if they can eventually revive and pass the “Build Back Better” legislation this year, it doesn’t offer enough free-market solutions and will not be able to cut emissions enough without expensive and damaging government regulation.

This lack of a united vision and broad political support all but guarantees a future path of more regulation as Democrats try to realize their climate ambitions through other means. Regulation will only complicate the business environment and breed more mistrust between the parties around this issue. And it’s all because Democrats decided to go it alone.

It is now clearer than ever that we must rise above partisanship to advance an effective national solution. Utah’s economy and way of life depend on it. Between worsening winter inversions and summers plagued by triple-digit heat and wildfire smoke, our future as a great place to live, work and recreate is at risk.

The good news is that we have a market based solution: an economywide carbon fee. A carbon fee would cut emissions faster than any other single policy under consideration without adding a dime to the federal deficit. At the same time, it delivers a stable environment for businesses while sending them a steady signal to innovate. Surely Utahns — and all Americans — can get behind a policy that encourages breakthroughs by giving the fuels and technologies of the future a fair shake in the marketplace.

We don’t need to wait on this policy just because inflation is on the rise. Places with a carbon price or fee, like Canada and the United Kingdom, have not experienced inflation as a result, according to recent research. In fact, a carbon fee has shown to have had a mild deflationary effect, as consumers and businesses have substituted away from high-carbon to low-carbon goods.

Given our economic challenges, an economywide carbon fee could be just what the doctor ordered. American industries are some of the cleanest in the world, yet we hold our door wide open to imports from high-polluting markets such as China. This amounts to punishing U.S. manufacturers for all the investments they have made to reduce emissions.

We can turn this situation around by applying a similar carbon price on imports at the border. This would grow our industries and reduce imports from high-polluting markets such as China. It also would compel other major economies to do their part to solve climate change. As Utah Sen. Mitt Romney put it recently, “We can negotiate with the Chinese, or we can simply have a border adjustment tax that recognizes that they put a lot more pollution in the air.”

Thanks to all these advantages, momentum for pricing carbon is building like never before. All we need is a leader — or group of leaders — who are willing to rise to the occasion, reach across party lines and unify America behind this commonsense solution.

This may sound like a tall order, but it is absolutely within our reach, and sooner than you may think. Our county has accomplished the impossible before when leaders have set aside politics to do what’s right for the country. That’s what the climate clean air challenge demands today, and it’s what we can achieve once we put our minds to it.

In many ways, Utah is leading the way. Rep. John Curtis deserves much credit for helping to steer his GOP colleagues toward meaningful solutions. Meanwhile, few people have spoken with as much credibility as Romney on the power of a carbon fee and border carbon adjustment to spur breakthroughs and put pressure on China to reduce emissions.

As we turn the page on a disappointing year for climate, let’s work toward a cleaner future. We now have clarity that the parties must work together on an effective national solution — and we have the solution. All we need Is someone to take it and run with it.

Bill Rappleye is president and CEO of the Draper Area (Utah) Chamber of Commerce

https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2022/1/11/22878552/opinion-america-needs-leaders-who-can-unite-the-nation-on-climate-change