Climate change isn't partisan. See the conservatives backing a price on carbon.
The Hoover Institution Shultz-Stephenson Energy Task Force
Partner of Sequoia Capital, Silicon Valley venture capital firm
Former U.S. Ambassador to Portugal
President of the Niskanen Center
Former Vice President at the Cato Institute
Economics Professor, Harvard University
Former Chairman of Council of Economic Advisers from 2003-2005
Senior Fellow & Director of Hudson Institute's Economic Policy Studies Group
Former Resident Scholar & Director of Regulatory Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute
Major European Oil & Gas Companies
Helge Lund (BG Group plc), Bob Dudley (BP plc), Claudio Descalzi (Eni S.p.A.), Ben van Beurden (Royal Dutch Shell plc), Eldar Saetre (Statoil ASA) & Patrick Polyanné
Conservative member of the House of Lords, UK Parliament
“Climate change is a global issue that requires a global solution. The Mining Association of Canada and its members offer the following principles for consideration: 1) Establish a broad-based carbon price. 2) Apply any climate change policy-related revenues to manage the transition toward a lower carbon future, including climate adaptation…”
“Putting a price on carbon pollution is by far the most powerful and efficient way to reduce emissions.”
“We have held the view that a revenue-neutral carbon tax is the best option. (It) could be a workable policy framework for countries around the world. They can tailor it to their own economic conditions."
“It is just the right moment to introduce carbon taxes.”
“Policy wonks like me have long argued that the best way to curb carbon emissions is to put a price on carbon. The cap-and-trade system President Obama advocates is one way to do that. A more direct and less bureaucratic way is to tax carbon. When polled, economists overwhelmingly support the idea.”
N. Gregory Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush, and economic adviser to Mitt Romney during 2014 presidential race, September 4, 2015
“Once people have to pay for their emissions, they find ingenious ways of reducing them.”
“Price carbon to save the planet if that pleases you; price carbon to permit growth-enhancing reforms to our tax code if that pleases you; price carbon both to save the planet and to reform the tax structure, if that is your pleasure. But price it.”
Irwin Stelzer, Senior Fellow & Director of Hudson Institute's Economic Policy Studies Group, and Former Resident Scholar & Director of Regulatory Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, May 7, 2015
“You can have growth that will protect the planet and decouple carbon emissions from growth. We can get it now, but it would be much easier if we put a price on carbon… When I meet business leaders from the very carbon-intensive industries, their openness to a carbon price is striking. They say, ‘let’s do it’.”
“A carbon tax, starting small and escalating to a significant level on a legislated schedule, would do the trick. I would make it revenue-neutral, returning all net funds generated to the taxpayers so that no fiscal drag results and the revenue would not be available for politicians to spend on pet projects.”
“What we and a number of our colleagues believe is that a better way to price
the externality of carbon and create a more level playing field is to pass a comprehensive and transparent national revenue-neutral carbon tax (RNCT) that would displace much of the existing energy and environmental regulatory maze."
Thomas F. Stephenson, Partner at Sequoia Capital Venture Fund, Former Ambassador to Portugal under President George H.W. Bush, Board Member of The Hoover Institution and Founder of its Shultz-Stephenson Energy Task Force, December 2, 2014
“In addition to encouraging investment in low-carbon generation, a carbon price also provides investors an incentive to pursue other low-carbon activities, such as tilting portfolios away from high-carbon investments, as they have a clearer view of the economic cost of holding high-carbon assets. However, without an effective price signal, the same incentives do not exist and investments get delayed or cancelled.”
Stephanie Pfeifer, Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (Europe); Nathan Fabian, Investor Group on Climate Change (Australia/New Zealand); Chris Davis, Investor Network on Climate Risk (North America); and Alexandra Tracy, Asia Investor Group on Climate Change, July 28, 2014
“A straight-up, revenue-neutral carbon tax clearly is our first-best policy, rewarding an infinite and unpredictable variety of innovations by which humans would satisfy their energy needs while releasing less carbon into the atmosphere.”
“The solution (to climate change) can be a fundamentally conservative one that will empower the marketplace to find the most efficient response. We can do this by putting a price on emissions of carbon dioxide — a carbon tax…Putting a price on emissions will create incentives to develop new, cleaner energy technologies.”
“A more efficient method of limiting global warming than regulatory controls such as proposed by the President (and that as described promise to be a bureaucratic nightmare) would be a tax on carbon emissions, which I advocated in my 2005 book and which a number of countries have adopted.”
“Consider a recent poll of a panel of economists conducted by the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, where I teach…[Forty-one] economists in [a poll conducted by the] University of Chicago…were asked whether they agreed with this statement: ‘A tax on the carbon content of fuels would be a less expensive way to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions than would a collection of policies such as ‘corporate average fuel economy’ requirements for automobiles.’ On this question, there was just a single negative vote.
“[A] carbon tax…should be enacted now…After that, it would ramp up gradually…What’s critical is that we lock in higher future costs of carbon today.
A CO2 tax trumps them all…reducing our trade deficit, making our economy more efficient, ameliorating global warming, and showing the world that American capitalism has not lost its edge.”
Q. “You have an idea for a flexible carbon tax. Why would Republicans go for that?”
A: “I am not a politician, but I think a couple of things might attract Republican interest. We’re not trying to raise revenue with this. The revenue should be recycled through tax cuts. The point here would be to solve the uncertainty problem in the private sector. You want to promote innovation, but you don’t want something like cap and trade.”
Glenn Hubbard, Dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Business, Russell L. Carson Professor of Finance and Economics, Chairman (2001-2003) of the Council of Economic Advisors under George W. Bush, October 13, 2010
“We condemn Wall Street for taking risks with our economy… but at the same time we’re taking exactly the same kind of risks, with no upside whatsoever, with regard to our climate, failing to practice even the basic risk management techniques in terms of climate change reduction.”
“We need to impose a tax on the thing we want less of (carbon dioxide) and reduce taxes on the things we want more of (income and jobs). A carbon tax would attach the national security and environmental costs to carbon-based fuels like oil, causing the market to recognize the price of these negative externalities. [B]oth Democrats and Republicans could support a carbon tax offset by a payroll or income tax cut.”
"Economic efficiency requires that those who generate emissions pay the cost, and the simplest way of forcing them to do so is through a carbon tax."
Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel laureate in economics and university professor, Columbia University; former chairman of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers and senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank, December 7, 2007
"At yesterday's Deals & Deal Makers Conference in New York, Glenn Hubbard, the Columbia Business School Dean and former Bush administration economic adviser, argued in favor of a carbon tax. ‘I believe that technology is the vital solution to fixing the problems of climate change. Businesspeople don’t innovate because it feels good; they innovate because there’s a return to that innovation. If you want a return to that innovation, you will have to price it – you will need to put a price on carbon, which means having, either through a cap-and-trade system or an explicit tax, some incentive to innovate carbon-saving technology.’”
"I prefer carbon and/or gasoline tax measures to permit systems or heavy regulatory approaches because the latter are more likely to be economically inefficient and to be regressive.”
"Of course, addressing climate change involves risks and costs. But much greater is the risk of failing to act. I am convinced that we can build a global plan of action on climate change in ways that create more economic opportunities than risks."
“After studying the data, we came to the conclusion that the science [of climate change] was compelling and that action should be taken."
“Risk of climate change is real. It's here. It's affecting our business today."
“If we’ve learned any lessons during the past few decades, perhaps the most important is that preservation of our environment is not a partisan challenge; it’s common sense. Our physical health, our social happiness, and our economic well-being will be sustained only by all of us working in partnership as thoughtful, effective stewards of our natural resources.”